Why Do Scientists Study Animals?

Scientists and others have many reasons for why it can be both good and bad to use animals for research. In the table are examples of both sides of this debate. And below we provide more details for each side.

While this table is incomplete, it gives a brief example of some of the reasons for why scientists and the public agree and disagree with using animals for research purposes. Below we provide a bit more detail on these positions. 

Advantages to Using Animals for Research

The cells, tissues, and organs of the human body work together in very complex ways. When scientists test a research question they want to test their ideas on a system that is as much like that of human bodies as possible. So far, a living animal has been a better model of the human body than what other laboratory techniques can provide.

Chimpanzees and mice (and other animals, too) do not look very much like humans, but it turns out that their DNA is very similar to that of humans. This makes humans and animals biologically similar, and they can sometimes be affected by the same health problems. Scientists take advantage of this similarity and use animal models to test their research ideas.

Scientists also tend to work with animals that have shorter life spans than humans. For example, laboratory mice may only live for 2 to 3 years. In contrast, humans can live upwards of 80 to 100 years. The shorter lifespan of animals gives researchers an opportunity to study different questions over an entire lifetime rather than a very small portion of it. This can help study diseases like Parkinson’s, which may not develop until a person has been alive for 40 to 50 years.

Disadvantages to Using Animals for Research

Some people also believe that, even though animals have similar biological systems to humans, they still may not make good models for many research questions. Some studies¹ have reported that even after doing a lot of animal research on a topic, it may remain difficult to use the findings of these studies in other contexts, like in a human or other animal.

Testing of the sleeping pill thalidomide is an example of this. It was tested on pregnant rats, mice, cats and guinea pigs to help sleeping without any bad side effects. But, when administered to pregnant women, it actually had many negative effects on their children. 

The opposite can also be true. Experiments may show that a certain protocol is harmful to animals. But it may turn out to have positive effects in humans. Aspirin is an example of this. It was shown to be dangerous to animals, but many people now find it to be a useful medication.

Others argue that even if we can use animals for research, there are always other alternatives to use in place of animals. These might include using computer models, cell cultures, or finding non-invasive methods that can be used on humans. Similarly, many argue that using these alternative methods is cheaper than using animal models.

The Final Decision

There is still no consensus on whether it's ok to use animals in research, and so scientists and the public continue to discuss and debate this topic. This has led to decisions about what animals should be used in research, and also the establishment of rules and regulations for how those animals will be treated while in this setting.

References: